MULDRAUGH, KY — April 29, 2025 — Muldraugh Police Chief Tim Jackson is facing increasing pressure after new revelations emerged about a troubling incident involving an officer suspected of being intoxicated. The officer, according to reports obtained through an Open Records Request, was allowed to drive a city-owned police cruiser back to City Hall, putting both the officer and the public at significant risk.
The incident, which was not publicly addressed by either Chief Jackson or Mayor Anthony Lee until now, has raised serious questions about leadership, accountability, and public safety. While the officer was reportedly intoxicated, no immediate action was taken to remove them from the vehicle, sparking outrage among residents who argue that this was a reckless decision with dangerous consequences.
A Reckless Decision with Dangerous Consequences
The situation has drawn sharp criticism from both the community and legal experts, who argue that allowing any officer to drive while intoxicated is a severe violation of the law and police ethics. Driving under the influence (DUI) is illegal in all states, and permitting a fellow officer to do so could be seen as aiding and abetting a crime.
Had the officer caused an accident, the consequences could have been dire. Not only could the department have faced civil liability, but it would have also severely damaged the public’s trust in the police force. As one resident put it, “Bad decisions can lead to tragedy. We were lucky this time, but what happens next?”
Public Outcry and Chief Jackson’s Response
The controversy intensified when Chief Jackson took to Facebook to address the issue. In a message directed at Josh Ferguson, a owner of Muldraugh Register, Jackson dismissed the criticism, stating, “If you’re talking about Jay, you don’t have the manhood or the facts. If you’re advocating for him, let his lawyers handle it.”
This response has only added fuel to the fire. Residents and City of Muldraugh citizens group are questioning the Chief’s judgment and leadership. “His Facebook message is unprofessional, and frankly, it’s insulting to those who are just asking for accountability,” said one local resident . “The public deserves answers, not condescending remarks.”
Jackson appears became upset and emotional after the incident per his Grayson County personnel file emotional behavior has been a problem in the past, Critics argue that this personal problem might cloud the Chief’s ability to handle certain situations .
Legal and Ethical Implications
Experts argue that allowing an officer to drive under the influence—especially without any immediate intervention—is not just a poor decision, but one that could carry serious legal ramifications.
- Violation of the Law: Driving under the influence is illegal. Allowing another officer to drive while intoxicated could be considered aiding and abetting a crime or even official misconduct.
- Departmental Misconduct: The officer who failed to intervene could face serious disciplinary action, including suspension or termination.
- Liability and Public Trust: If an accident had occurred, both the department and the officer involved could be held liable for any damages. Moreover, incidents like these erode public trust in law enforcement.
Calls for Transparency and Accountability
With both Jackson and Mayor Lee remaining silent for much of the controversy, residents are demanding transparency. “We need to know why this officer was allowed to drive when it’s clear they were not fit to do so,” said one Muldraugh resident. “And we need to hear it from the people in charge, not through vague social media posts or press release.”
Citizens are calling for an investigation into the incident, as well as a review of department policies to prevent similar situations from happening in the future.
As this story continues to develop, Muldraugh residents are left questioning the integrity of their police department and the ability of its leadership to ensure public safety.
About the Author
